A proposed collaboration model — not an existing formal relationship
For instructors and collaborators
The platform carries the administration; teaching authority stays with the teacher.
Curriculum stewardship
The pathway structure, module ordering and lesson framing are configurable and reviewable — the platform proposes, the instructor decides, and nothing is presented as final without that review.
Student verification
Instructors confirm which courses a student has actually completed. That verification is the key that opens material — so access always traces to a teaching judgement, never to an algorithm.
Announcements & commentary
A place to speak to students directly — announcements for the practical, commentary where an instructor wants to frame material in their own voice, always attributed and never generated.
Resource provenance
Every resource names its source, its rights holder and its basis for being here. An instructor can see — and challenge — where anything came from.
Course & permission management
Which courses exist, what each one requires, and what completing it opens: managed in one place, with changes recorded.
Feedback & platform development
A built-in feedback workflow catalogues what should change, page by page, so the platform develops under the direction of the people teaching with it.
Working with authorized organisations
This platform is an independent prototype, built to be shown, questioned, and shaped. The intended model is collaboration with authorized instructors, course providers and rights holders — their material published only with their permission, on their terms, with provenance kept.
Nothing on this page describes an existing agreement. It describes what the platform is built to support, pending the conversations that would make it real.